MedPharmRes
University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City
Original article

Somatic Symptoms in Major Depressive Disorder: A Cross-sectional Study in a Mental Health Setting, Vietnam

Phi Nguyen Yen Hoa,*https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5585-6269, Chau Minh Phamahttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5082-5962, Manh Xuan Buiahttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7219-0195, Ngoc Anh Tranahttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1260-8326, Nghia Trung Tranahttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5028-3040, Quynh Ho Ngoc Huynhbhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0825-5449, Linh Tich Ngoahttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5308-8614, Huy Tien Nguyenchttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9543-9440
aDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
bDepartment of Health Education and Psychology in Medicine, Faculty of Public Health, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
cSchool of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
*Address correspondence: to Ho Nguyen Yen Phi at the Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; E-mail: honguyenyenphi@ump.edu.vn

© Copyright 2023 MedPharmRes. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Oct 29, 2022; Revised: Nov 09, 2022; Accepted: Nov 17, 2022

Published Online: Oct 30, 2023

Abstract:

Introduction:

Major depressive disorder (MDD) presents a diverse clinical picture, especially with somatic symptoms, which can lead to negative impacts on the course and prognosis of the illness. This study aimed to (1) assess the prevalence of various somatic symptoms in MDD patients and (2) assess their association with demographic factors.

Methods:

A total of 345 outpatients diagnosed with MDD according to DSM-5 criteria were enrolled in this cross-sectional study over 6 months. Participants completed a questionnaire that included clinical and demographic information as well as the PHQ-9.

Results:

There were 99.7% of patients who had at least one somatic symptom. The common somatic symptoms were fatigue (89.9%), insomnia (87.8%), palpitations (77.7%), headache (69.6%) and dizziness (61.4%). Total PHQ-9 scores and total number of somatic symptoms were found to have a regression relationship with a regression coefficient of 0.14 (t = 6.001, p < 0.001). In multiple logistic regression analysis, female gender was found to be associated with dizziness (odd ratios [OR] = 2.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.53-4.21, p < 0.01), headaches (OR = 1.94, 95% CI 1.16-3.32, p < 0.05), and bowel problems (OR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.37-0.96, p < 0.05); while headaches (OR = 1.73, 95% CI 1.05-2.85, p < 0.05), and stomach problems (OR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.36-0.88, p < 0.05) were associated with age 40 and below.

Conclusions:

The study findings provide a resource for clinicians in mental health settings as well as primary care clinics in detecting inexplicable somatic symptoms associated with MDD.

Keywords: major depressive disorder; somatic symptom; mental health center; Vietnam; Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)

1. INTRODUCTION

According to the World Health Organization, approximately 322 million people globally suffered from major depressive disorder (MDD) in 2015 [1], and this figure was expected to increase by 53.2 million by 2020 owing to coronavirus disease (COVID-19) [2]. The disorder is ranked first as a global burden [3] and third as a leading cause of disability among mental health illnesses [4]. Since the clinical picture of MDD shows various symptoms, with somatic symptoms being a prevalent component [5], patients with depression first tend to seek medical support in primary care settings rather than psychiatric clinics [6]. An international study that recruited patients from 15 primary care centers in 14 countries on five continents found that approximately 45% to 95% of patients with MDD visit primary care facilities due to their chiefly somatic symptoms [7].

Any somatic symptom increases twice the likelihood of mood disorders compared to controls [6], and the number of these symptoms can predict the symptom severity of MDD [8] and the presence of suicidal ideation [9]. The more somatic symptoms patients with MDD experience, the lower their level of social function and quality of life [10]. The presence and severity of somatic symptoms in patients with MDD at baseline and the persistence of these symptoms after adequate intervention negatively impact on course and prognosis, which can predict remission, relapse, and recurrence of MDD, as well as quality of life and social burden [11]. Therefore, early detection of somatic symptoms in patients with MDD is critical for the intervention and management of the disorder [12].

In Vietnam, although MDD is the second most prevalent mental health condition, at 2.8% among the general population [13], there has been no study relating to this issue. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of various somatic symptoms in patients with MDD and their association with clinical and demographic characteristics.

2. MATERIALS AND METHOD

2.1. Study settings

A cross-sectional study was conducted at the outpatient unit of Mental Health Hospital in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, from January to June 2018.

2.2. Participants

All 18-year-old and older patients were recruited if they were diagnosed with MDD by licensed psychiatrists based on the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (SCID-5), introduced by the American Psychiatric Association (APA) (https://www.appi.org/products/structured-clinical-interview-for-dsm-5-scid-5). Agreement to participate in the survey was given by participants who had the ability to communicate in Vietnamese.

The exclusion criteria were: presenting clinically significant abnormal findings on physical examination and laboratory tests; being on psychotropic medications two weeks before recruitment based on health record reviews; and meeting other mental health conditions based on DSM-5 criteria (including psychosis, dementia, bipolar disorder, and mental retardation).

2.3. Sampling

Interviewers first provided the information and the purpose of the study to all eligible participants and their caretakers, then requested them to sign an informed consent form and collected demographic questionnaires. All eligible recruits were invited to complete a somatic symptom checklist and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). The interviewers would read each question and its responses from the PHQ-9 and the somatic symptom checklist to patients who could not read Vietnamese due to their low educational level or visual impairments.

2.4. Measures

The clinical and demographic questions included age, sex, marital status, education level, occupational status, economic status, PHQ-9 score, and somatic symptom checklist. Since the majority of Vietnamese people consider their economic status to be a crucial concern, the question “How do you rate your economic standing?” was used to evaluate patients’ perceptions of the issue rather than ranking those based on their month’s profit.

The fourteen somatic symptoms were backaches, chest pains, bowel problems (constipation and/or diarrhea), dizziness, faintness, fatigue, palpitations, headaches, dysmenorrhea, stomach problems (nausea and/or flatulence), dyspareunia, tachypnea, abdominal pain, and insomnia. As for somatic symptoms, participants could respond with “yes” or “not at all”.

The PHQ-9, a multifunctional instrument for screening and scaling MDD symptom severity [14], was developed by Kroenke et al. in 2001 [15] and has been translated into more than 60 languages, including the Vietnamese version elsewhere [16]. The scale takes approximately 3 to 5 minutes to complete and rates the frequency of the symptoms over the last two weeks on a 4-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 3, on which 0, 1, 2, and 3 represent not at all, several days, more than half the days, and nearly every day, respectively [14]. Cutoff scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 represent the symptom severity, namely, mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe, respectively [17]. Cronbach’s α for the scale ranged from 0.74 to 0.89, showing good internal consistency [15, 18-20]. In the present study, the PHQ-9 showed good internal consistency, as represented by Cronbach’s α coefficient of 0.749.

2.5. Statistical method

The data was entered into SPSS version 28.0 for analysis. The demographic factors were the independent variables, while total PHQ-9 scores and somatic symptoms were the dependent variables. Numeric variables with a normal distribution were expressed as means (SD) and ranges, while non-normal variables were described by median and interquartile range. Categorical variables were expressed as percentages (%). An independent-sample T test was used to assess whether there were statistically significant differences between the mean total PHQ-9 scores, the mean number of somatic symptoms, and demographic factors. A simple linear regression was conducted to evaluate a correlation between the PHQ-score and the number of somatic symptoms.

Logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the impact of gender and age on the presence of somatic symptoms. First, the chi-squared test was applied to detect the significant associations between demographic variables and these fourteen somatic symptoms. A univariable binary logistic regression analysis was performed with each associated somatic symptom and demographic factors. Finally, multivariable analysis with the Enter method containing all variables that had a p-value of less than 0.25 [21] was performed to determine the association as well as the degree of those between demographic factors and somatic symptoms by calculating the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The model’s goodness of fit was evaluated using Hosmer and Lemeshow. Statistical significance was set at a p-value of less than 0.05, and a two-sided test was used.

3. RESULTS

3.1. Overall results

Of the 345 eligible participants, 73% were women, and the mean age was 41.1 years (SD ± 14.7) with a range of 16 to 84 years. Most patients were married and had an average or high income (around 65% and 88.7%, respectively). The detailed characteristics are presented in table 1. In terms of depressive symptom severity, the mean PHQ-9 score was 15.8 ± 5.5 with a range from 1 to 27. The symptom severity of severe accounted for 28.1%, while those for mild, moderate, and moderately severe were 15.4%, 23.8%, and 32.8%, respectively.

Table 1. Association between socio-demographic factors and PHQ-9 scores, the number of somatic symptoms
Characteristic N (%) PHQ-9 scores* Number of somatic symptoms*
Mean ± SD t p-value Mean ± SD t p-value
Sex Female 252 (73.0) 16.13 ± 5.49 - 1.623 0.106 7.18 ± 2.47 - 1.509 0.132
Male 93 (27.0) 15.04 ± 5.59 6.73 ± 2.45
Age groups ≤ 40 years 171 (49.5) 16.03 ± 5.53 - 0.636 0.525 7.49 ± 2.47 - 3.208 0.001
> 40 years 174 (50.5) 15.65 ± 5.55 6.64 ± 2.39
Marital status Married 222 (64.4) 15.44 ± 5.65 - 1.791 0.074 6.87 ± 2.48 - 1.943 0.053
Single/Separated 123 (35.6) 16.55 ± 5.27 7.41 ± 2.41
Education Primary school or under 85 (24.5) 16.71 ± 5.15 1.669 0.096 7.18 ± 2.59 0.497 0.620
Secondary school or higher 260 (75.5) 15.55 ± 5.63 7.02 ± 2.43
Job status Executive 129 (37.4) 17.00 ± 5.13 3.048 0.002 6.93 ± 2.48 - 0.759 0.448
Unskilled/not working 216 (62.6) 15.14 ± 5.66 7.14 ± 2.46
Economic status Low-income 39 (11.3) 16.95 ± 4.44 1.601 0.115 7.21 ± 2.64 0.387 0.699
Average or high-income 306 (88.7) 15.70 ± 5.65 7.04 ± 2.45

Using independent T test to compare differences between demographic groups (significant level p < 0.05)

Download Excel Table

In this study, 99.7% of participants had at least one somatic symptom, of which fatigue was the most common (89.9%), closely followed by sleep disturbance, palpitations, headache, and dizziness (87.8%, 77.7%, 69.6%, and 61.4%, respectively). The prevalence of each medically unexplained somatic symptom is further illustrated in Figure 1. The mean number of somatic symptoms was 7 (SD 2.4), with a range of 0 to 14 symptoms.

mpr-7-3-42-g1
Figure 1. Prevalence of somatic symptoms
Download Original Figure
3.2. Association between demographic factors and PHQ-9 scores and the number of somatic symptoms

Table 1 demonstrates the association between demographic profiles and total PHQ-9 scores as well as the total number of somatic symptoms by using an independent-samples T test. Patients in an executive job had a considerably higher mean total PHQ-9 score than those in an unskilled job or those who were not working (p = 0.002). Additionally, patients aged 40 and below had a significantly higher total number of somatic symptoms than those aged over 40 (p = 0.001).

Using the total score of PHQ-9 as the independent variable, a linear regression model of the total score of PHQ-9 and the total number of somatic symptoms was conducted.

Applying the total score of PHQ-9 as an independent variable X and the total number of somatic symptoms as a dependent variable Y, the regression equation was Y = 4.88 + 0.14 X (Figure 2). The regression coefficient of 0.137 was tested using the t test, yielding t = 6.001 (p < 0.001), and revealing a regression relation between total PHQ-9 scores and the total number of somatic symptoms. The regression model showed a good fit, with R2 = 0.095 as the coefficient of determination, which has a valuable range from 0 to 1 [22].

mpr-7-3-42-g2
Figure 2. Regression line graph of total PHQ-9 scores and the total number of somatic symptoms
Download Original Figure
3.3. The impact of demographic characteristics on somatic symptoms

Female patients with MDD were more likely to exhibit dizziness (odds ratios [OR] = 2.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.53-4.21), headaches (OR = 1.94, 95% CI 1.16-3.32), and less likely to complain of bowel problems (OR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.37-0.96). When compared to patients aged over 40, patients aged 40 and below were more likely to exhibit headaches (OR = 1.73, 95% CI 1.05-2.85), and were less likely to complain of stomach problems (OR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.36-0.88). Additionally, the high risk of developing somatic symptoms in patients with MDD was found to be related to single or separated marital status, including dizziness (OR = 2.12, 95% CI 1.27-3.55), dysmenorrhea (OR = 1.89, 95% CI 1.03-3.47), dyspareunia (OR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.21-0.73); and unskilled or not working job status, including chest pain (OR = 1.98, 95% CI 1.23-3.14), stomach problems (OR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.38-0.96), and dyspareunia (OR = 2.04, 95% CI 1.13-3.68) (Table 2).

Table 2. The results of logistic regression model
Variable dependent Independent ß SE Odd ratios 95% CI p-value
Chest pain Marital status 0.26 0.23 1.30 0.83 2.06 0.247
Job status 0.67 0.23 1.96 1.23 3.14 0.005
Dizziness Gender 0.93 0.25 2.54 1.53 4.21 < 0.001
Age 0.33 0.24 1.39 0.87 2.24 0.164
Marital status 0.75 0.26 2.12 1.27 3.55 0.004
Headache Gender 0.66 0.26 1.94 1.16 3.23 0.011
Age 0.55 0.25 1.73 1.05 2.85 0.029
Marital status 0.34 0.27 1.41 0.83 2.40 0.203
Dysmenorrhea Age -0.45 0.30 0.63 0.34 1.16 0.144
Marital status 0.63 0.31 1.89 1.03 3.47 0.039
Educational degree 0.38 0.34 1.46 0.74 2.90 0.270
Stomach problems Age -0.56 0.22 0.56 0.36 0.88 0.012
Job status -0.49 0.23 0.61 0.38 0.96 0.034
Dyspareunia Age 0.55 0.28 1.73 0.99 3.03 0.051
Marital status -0.91 0.31 0.40 0.21 0.73 0.003
Job status 0.71 0.30 2.04 1.13 3.68 0.018
Bowel problems Gender -0.51 0.24 0.59 0.37 0.96 0.036
Abdominal pain Age 0.51 0.26 1.67 0.99 2.80 0.051
Marital status 0.30 0.26 1.35 0.80 2.28 0.250

SE: standard error; CI confidence interval

Download Excel Table

4. DISCUSSION

Our study adds considerable data to the field, showing that 99.7% of patients with MDD visiting a mental health center experience at least one somatic symptom. This prevalence is high but still consistent with that reported by Garciá-Campayo et al. (93%) [23], Caballero et al. (93%) [24], and Simon et al. (45% to 95%) [7]. With regards to the prevalence of medically unexplained somatic symptoms in MDD patients, our findings indicate that the top five somatic symptoms among Vietnamese patients with depression visiting the mental health center are, in order of frequency, fatigue (89.9%), insomnia (87.8%), palpitations (77.7%), headaches (69.6%), and dizziness (61.4%). The results corresponded with those of Zhao et al. [25], in which insomnia was the most common somatic symptom for MDD patients visiting both psychiatric and general hospitals (66.4% and 62.3%, respectively), while other common somatic symptoms for depressed patients visiting psychiatric hospitals were pre-verbal physical complaints (47.8%), low appetite (38.5%), weight loss (38.2%), and headaches (29.5%). Bekhuis et al. [26] divided somatic symptoms into groups based on systems, including musculoskeletal (52.3%), cardiopulmonary (35.2%), and gastrointestinal clusters (29.8%). Fornalo et al. [27] found that the four most frequent somatic symptoms were asthenia (64.4%), insomnia (41.5%), tenseness (39.8%), and headaches (38.5%). Similarly, other studies revealed that common somatic symptoms in MDD patients visiting primary care institutions were fatigue, cardiovascular complaints, gastrointestinal complaints, musculoskeletal complaints, headaches, and sleep disturbance [28, 29].

The present study revealed a strong association between the number of somatic symptoms and depressive symptom severity in which patients with a high level of depressive symptom severity were likely to experience more somatic symptoms than others (t = 12.715, p = 0.000). This result was consistent with that published by Garciá-Campayo et al. [23] and Von Korff et al. [30, 31]. Our study also discovered that patients under 40 years of age exhibited more somatic symptoms than those who were over 40, similar to the findings of Zhao et al. [25]. In this study, there was no significant association between sex and the number of somatic symptoms, whereas Silverstein et al. found that the prevalence of somatic depression was much higher among women than among men [32].

Our results concur with earlier studies in terms of the association between somatic symptoms and age as well as sex. Patients under the age of 40 usually complained about headaches (OR = 1.73, 95% CI 1.05-2.85) and were less likely to complain of stomach problems (OR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.36-0.88). Similarly, Zhao et al. concluded that, compared to other age groups, patients over 40 years of age have the highest percentage of insomnia, low appetite, pre-verbal physical complaints, respiratory system complaints, and trunk pain [25]. Additionally, our study proposes that sex mainly makes a difference in the types of somatic symptoms among MDD patients, including dizziness, headaches, and intestinal complaints. The findings were consistent with those of some international studies, in which female patients with MDD experienced more somatic symptoms than males [32], especially insomnia, low appetite [25, 33], and pain [34, 35]. Our study discovered that some specific somatic symptoms varied by marital status, occupational status, and education level. Overall, our findings are consistent with some studies and conflict with others. The inconsistencies may be due to different study settings and populations.

To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess the somatic symptoms in patients with MDD in Vietnam. To improve future research, some limitations should be addressed. Due to the characteristics of a small sample size and single-facility design, the findings may not generalize to the general population. Additionally, since there were gaps in the data related to the starting time of somatic symptoms, their frequency, severity, and consequences, the study’s results did not reflect an overview evaluation of these symptoms in patients with major depressive disorder. Therefore, further studies should be performed to investigate all aspects of somatic symptoms in patients with MDD who seek mental health facilities as well as primary health care in Vietnam.

Conclusion

Most Vietnamese patients with MDD exhibited somatic symptoms (99.7%), of which the common somatic symptoms were fatigue (89.9%), insomnia (87.8%), palpitations (77.7%), headaches (69.6%), and dizziness (61.4%). The number of somatic symptoms was significantly associated with age over 40 (p = 0.001) and had a regression relationship with MDD symptom severity (p = 0.000). Gender, age, marital status, and job status were found to be correlated with some somatic symptoms, including chest pain, dizziness, headaches, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and intestinal problems (p< 0.05). The findings provide data for practitioners in both mental health settings as well as primary care clinics to detect inexplicable somatic symptoms co-occurring with MDD.

ETHICAL STATEMENT

This study was carried out in accordance with the latest version of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study design was reviewed by an appropriate ethical committee and participants’ informed consent was obtained after the nature of the procedures was fully explained to them.

The study protocol was accepted by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City and designated 99/ÐHYD-HÐ.

FUNDING

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship and publication of this article.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We would like to thank the patients and staff of the Mental Health Hospital in Ho Chi Minh City who kindly participated in this study. We are most grateful to all psychiatrists in the outpatient unit at the Mental Health Hospital for their support with recruitment.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTION

HNYP contributed to conceptual design, data gathering, statistical analysis, the provision of the original draft, and as a corresponding author. PTMC, BXM and TAN contributed to conceptual design, data gathering, statistical analysis, and the provision of the original draft. TTN and HHNQ contributed to conceptual design, statistical analysis, and manuscript editing. NTL and NTH supervised the conceptual design, statistical analysis, and final manuscript performance. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

REFERENCES

1.

Organization, W.H., Depression and other common mental disorders: global health estimates. World Health Organization. 2017.

2.

Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet. 2021; 398(10312):1700-12

3.

Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2017; 390(10100):1211-59

4.

Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. 2017. Lancet. 2018; 392(10159):69

5.

Sugahara H, Akamine M, Kondo T, Fujisawa K, Yoshimasu K, Tokunaga S, Kudo C. Somatic symptoms most often associated with depression in an urban hospital medical setting in Japan. Psychiatry Res. 2004; 128(3):305-11

6.

Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Linzer M, Hahn SR, deGruy III FV, Brody D. Physical symptoms in primary care: predictors of psychiatric disorders and functional impairment. Archives of family medicine. 1994; 3(9):774

7.

Simon GE, VonKorff M, Piccinelli M, Fullerton C, Ormel J. An international study of the relation between somatic symptoms and depression. New England journal of medicine. 1999; 341(18):1329-35

8.

Jeon SW, Yoon SY, Ko YH, Joe SH, Kim YK, Han C, Yoon HK, Lui CY. Do Somatic Symptoms Predict the Severity of Depression? A Validation Study of the Korean Version of the Depression and Somatic Symptoms Scale. J Korean Med Sci. 2016; 31(12):2002-9

9.

Fang X, Zhang C, Wu Z, Peng D, Xia W, Xu J, Fang Y. The association between somatic symptoms and suicidal ideation in Chinese first-episode major depressive disorder. J Affect Disord. 2019; 245:17-21

10.

Chen L, Jia S, Li P, Shi Z, Li Y. Experiences and coping strategies of somatic symptoms in patients with depressive disorder: A qualitative study. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing. 2022; 38:6-13

11.

Woo JM, Jeon HJ, Noh E, Kim HJ, Lee SW, Lee KK, Kim SH, Hong JP. Importance of remission and residual somatic symptoms in health-related quality of life among outpatients with major depressive disorder: a cross-sectional study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014; 12:188

12.

McIntyre RS, Konarski JZ, Mancini DA, Zurowski M, Giacobbe P, Soczynska JK, Kennedy SH. Improving outcomes in depression: a focus on somatic symptoms. J Psychosom Res. 2006; 60(3):279-82

13.

Vuong DA, Van Ginneken E, Morris J, Ha ST, Busse R. Mental health in Vietnam: Burden of disease and availability of services. Asian J Psychiatr. 2011; 4(1):65-70

14.

Spitzer R, Kroenke K, Williams JB. Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders. Patient Health Questionnaire. Jama. 1999; 282(18):1737-44

15.

Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001; 16(9):606-13

16.

Nguyen TQ, Bandeen-Roche K, Bass JK, German D, Nguyen NT, Knowlton AR. A tool for sexual minority mental health research: The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) as a depressive symptom severity measure for sexual minority women in Viet Nam. J Gay Lesbian Ment Health. 2016; 20(2):173-191

17.

Arroll B, Goodyear-Smith F, Crengle S, Gunn J, Kerse N, Fishman T, Falloon K, Hatcher S. Validation of PHQ-2 and PHQ-9 to screen for major depression in the primary care population. The Annals of Family Medicine. 2010; 8(4):348-53

18.

Sung SC, Low CC, Fung DS, Chan YH. Screening for major and minor depression in a multiethnic sample of Asian primary care patients: a comparison of the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-Report (QIDS-SR16 ). Asia Pac Psychiatry. 2013; 5(4):249-58

19.

Titov N, Dear BF, McMillan D, Anderson T, Zou J, Sunderland M. Psychometric comparison of the PHQ-9 and BDI-II for measuring response during treatment of depression. Cogn Behav Ther. 2011; 40(2):126-36

20.

Yu X, Tam WW, Wong PT, Lam TH, Stewart SM. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for measuring depressive symptoms among the general population in Hong Kong. Compr Psychiatry. 2012; 53(1):95-102

21.

Zhang Z. Model building strategy for logistic regression: purposeful selection. Ann Transl Med. 2016; 4(6):111

22.

Kiernan D. Chapter 7: Correlation and Simple Linear Regression. Open SUNY Textbooks. 2014.

23.

García-Campayo J, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Caballero L, Romera I, Aragonés E, Rodríguez-Artalejo F, Quail D, Gilaberte I. Relationship of somatic symptoms with depression severity, quality of life, and health resources utilization in patients with major depressive disorder seeking primary health care in Spain. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2008; 10(5):355-62

24.

Caballero L, Aragones E, Garcia-Campayo J, Rodriguez-Artalejo F, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Polavieja P, Gomez-Utrero E, Romera I, Gilaberte I. Prevalence, characteristics, and attribution of somatic symptoms in Spanish patients with major depressive disorder seeking primary health care. Psychosomatics. 2008; 49(6):520-9

25.

Zhao D, Wu Z, Zhang H, Mellor D, Ding L, Wu H, Wu C, Huang J, Hong W, Peng D, Fang Y. Somatic symptoms vary in major depressive disorder in China. Comprehensive psychiatry. 2018; 87:32-7

26.

Bekhuis E, Boschloo L, Rosmalen JGM, de Boer MK, Schoevers RA. The impact of somatic symptoms on the course of major depressive disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2016; 205(Supplement C):112-8

27.

Fornaro M, Maremmani I, Canonico PL, Carbonatto P, Mencacci C, Muscettola G, Pani L, Torta R, Vampini C, Parazzini F, Dumitriu A, Perugi G. Prevalence and diagnostic distribution of medically unexplained painful somatic symptoms across 571 major depressed outpatients. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment. 2011; 7:217

28.

Passamonti M, Pigni M, Fraticelli C, Calori G, Piccinelli M. Somatic symptoms and depression in general practice in Italy. Eur J Gen Pract. 2003; 9(2):66-7

29.

Yu DS, Lee DT. Do medically unexplained somatic symptoms predict depression in older Chinese?. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2012; 27(2):119-26

30.

Von Korff M, Ormel J, Keefe FJ, Dworkin SF. Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain. 1992; 50(2):133-49

31.

Von Korff M, Ormel J, Katon W, Lin EH. Disability and depression among high utilizers of health care: a longitudinal analysis. Archives of general psychiatry. 1992; 49(2):91-100

32.

Silverstein B. Gender differences in the prevalence of somatic versus pure depression: a replication. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2002; 159(6):1051-2

33.

Wenzel A, Steer RA, Beck AT. Are there any gender differences in frequency of self-reported somatic symptoms of depression?. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2005; 89(1-3):177-81

34.

Muñoz RA, McBride ME, Brnabic AJM, López CJ, Hetem LAB, Secin R, Dueñas HJ. Major depressive disorder in Latin America: The relationship between depression severity, painful somatic symptoms, and quality of life. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2005; 86(1):93-8

35.

Chaudhry HR, Arshad N, Jave F, Asif A. Frequency of psychological and somatic symptoms in patients with major depressive disorder. Asian Journal of Psychiatry. 2010; 3(3):152-154