MedPharmRes
University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City
Original article

Assessment of stability of HbA1c levels in human whole blood samples using immunoassays

Thuan Thi Minh Nguyena,*https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8137-6955, Dung Thi Van Nguyenbhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3838-8800
aBiochemistry Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
bMedical Testing Laboratory, Tay Nguyen University, Viet Nam
*Address correspondence to Thuan Thi Minh Nguyen at the Biochemistry Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam; Tel/Fax; E-mail: ntmthuan@ump.edu.vn

© Copyright 2023 MedPharmRes. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Feb 15, 2023; Revised: Mar 19, 2023; Accepted: Apr 03, 2023

Published Online: Oct 30, 2023

Abstract:

Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels in whole blood samples are commonly used to diagnose diabetes and monitor the effectiveness of glycemic control. However, there have not been many studies evaluating changes in HbA1c concentration under different storage conditions and analytical methods. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the stability of %HbA1c stored at different temperature conditions using immunoassays in order to improve the quality of HbA1c test. Whole blood samples collected from 10 healthy volunteers were anticoagulated with K2 EDTA and stored at the following temperatures: 20-25 °C, 2-8 °C, and -20 °C. %HbA1c in human whole blood samples at each time point was determined simultaneously on Standard F Analyzer (%HbA1c-S) with reagent kit based on a reflectometry and immunoassay technology, and Erba XL640 system (%HbA1c-E) used immunoturbidimetric method, respectively. %HbA1c was assessed as stable when the difference in HbA1c level at the later time point was not statistically significant (p >0.05) compared with baseline (T0). Results showed that a positive correlation between %HbA1c-S and %HbA1c-E at T0 (r=0.9996) was observed at room temperature. %HbA1c-S was stabilized for 24 hours at 20-25 °C, for 2 days at 2-8°C and for more than 1 month at -20 °C. %HbA1c-E was stable for 12 hours at 20-25°C; less than 1 day at 2-8°C, and less than 1 month at -20°C. In conclusion, human whole blood samples for HbA1c determination can be stored for up to 1 month at -20°C.

Keywords: HbA1c; immunoassay; stability; storage temperature

1. INTRODUCTION

Currently, most medical diagnoses are based on test results(1). However, analytical errors at the pre-analytical period will lead to unexpected changes in analytical results in biological samples(2,3). There are several conditions where the HbA1c test can produce inaccurate results. Delays in transportation and sample handling, and whole blood samples stored at inappropriate temperature conditions can cause inaccurate test results 4-9. Therefore, the stability of biochemical parameters has been evaluated under the conditions of transporting and storing samples at the pre-test period to ensure the accuracy of test results(4-9).

Test %HbA1c has significant importance in diagnosing diabetes and monitoring the effectiveness of blood sugar control for patients(10). HbA1c levels were usually measured in laboratories using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method due to its high accuracy of results. In recent years, HbA1c levels have been measured by various methods such as affinity assay, immunoassay (IA) and enzymatic assay. However, HbA1c levels may vary depending on the analytical equipment and reagents used. Although HPLC has been considered the reference method for other methods of HbA1c quantification, in practice, depending on the analytical conditions, laboratories often use analytical methods that are faster and less complex than HPLC, such as IA, to determine %HbA1c(11). HbA1c immunoassay is a bioanalytical method in which the HbA1c concentration depends on the response of HbA1c to HbA1c antibodies. The HbA1c immunoassay has been shown to correlate well, with low concordance accuracy, and with low bias with the HPLC method. However, differences in HbA1c results between immunoassays were still found(12). There have not been many studies evaluating the difference in HbA1c results between immunoassays in Vietnam. Many studies on the stability of HbA1c have been carried out, but there are no studies on HbA1c storage conditions with different quantitative methods under storage conditions in Vietnam at present. The objective of this study was to evaluate the stability of HbA1c in whole blood at different temperatures over time by two HbA1c immunoassays in order to increase the accuracy HbA1c test results, thereby to improve the treatment for diabetes patients.

2. MATERIALS AND METHOD

2.1. Materials and the instruments

Erba HbA1C test reagent kit and SD Biosensor Standard F HbA1C kit for HbA1C qualitative assay were obtained from ERBA Diagnostics Mannheim and SD Biosensor, respectively. Standard F Analyzers (SD Biosensor) and Erba XL640 system (Erba Mannheim) which meet IVD certificate were used to determine HbA1c levels in human whole blood samples with respective reagent kits.

2.2. Sample collection

Whole blood samples for the purposes of this study were approved by the Ethics Committee of University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City issued together with Decision No. 759/ÐHYD-HÐÐÐ October 20, 2022. Ten ml of venous whole blood from ten volunteers (5 men and 5 women) were collected in blood tubes containing K2EDTA anticoagulant and gently mixed. Whole blood was then divided into sterile test tubes (0.5 mL/tube). Blood donors who have met the criteria for blood donation according to Circular 26/2013/TT-BYT issued on September 16, 2013, such as from 18 to 60 years old, minimum weight 42kg for women and 45kg for men, and do not use any drugs. The exclusion criteria for blood samples included missing sampling information, clotted blood, cracked or broken sample tubes, and anticoagulants other than K2 EDTA.

2.3. Analytical method

All procedures for blood sampling, sample processing and HbA1c quantification in blood samples were carried out at Buon Ma Thuot Medical Testing Center, which has been recognized to meet ISO 15189:2012 for laboratory biosafety cabinet - Class II. The HbA1c analyzers were checked with internal control samples for HbA1c each day before HbA1c quantification in the blood samples.

Blood tubes were stored under temperature conditions such as 20-25 °C, 2-8 °C, and -20 °C to evaluate stability of HbA1c levels (%HbA1c) in whole blood. %HbA1c in whole blood samples at each time point was determined simultaneously on Standard F Analyzer and Erba XL640 system using immunoassays.

The test procedure on STANDARD F Analyzer was briefly summarized as follows: 5 μL of whole blood was placed in a tube containing extraction buffer and latex tablet and then mixed well. All specimen mixture was collected to analyze on STANDARD F Analyzer. STANDARD F Analyzer measures the color intensity of the total hemoglobin and the HbA1c assay zones separately at the test device. The percentage of HbA1c in the blood sample is the ratio between HbA1c and hemoglobin(13).

The procedure for HbA1c quantification with the Erba HbA1c kit is based on the immunoturbidimetric method. The test procedure on Erba XL640 Analyser was briefly summarized as follows: 10 μl of whole blood was lysed with 500 μl of hemolyzing solution for 5 min. After mixing 30 μl of lysate and 1 ml of buffer containing latex particles in a test tube and incubating for 5 min, 500 μl of buffer containing anti-human HbA1c monoclonal antibody and anti-mouse IgG polyclonal antibody was added. Absorbance was read accurately at 660 nm for 5 min. Erba XL640 system directly measures HbA1c levels without determination of the total hemoglobin.

At 20-25 °C, HbA1c levels in blood samples were measured at times 0 (T0), 4 (T4h), 12 (T12h), and 24 hours (T24h). At 2-8 °C, HbA1c levels in blood samples were measured on days 1 (T1d), 2 (T2d) and 4 (T4d). At -20 °C, HbA1c levels in blood samples were measured at months 1 (T1m) and 3 (T3m). HbA1c quantification was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. HbA1c levels in each blood sample from 10 volunteers were measured twice. Blood samples stored at 2-8 °C and -20 °C must be conditioned at room temperature for 15 minutes before HbA1c quantification and should not be reused for further testing. The stability of HbA1c was assessed by comparing HbA1c concentrations at the following time points with baseline (T0). Thus, the mean HbA1c concentrations of 10 volunteers stored at 20-25°C were quantified at 4 hours, 12 hours and 24 hours and compared with baseline (HbA1cT0). This comparison was similar for blood samples stored at 2-8°C and -20°C. If the HbA1c concentration is determined to be unstable at a one-time matter, no subsequent determination of HbA1c is necessary. The influence of the quantitative method on HbA1c was investigated by comparing the difference in the results of HbA1c quantification between the two methods at each testing time.

2.4. Data analysis

Statistics were performed using Microsoft Excel 2013. The results were expressed as mean ± SD (standard deviation). Paired sample T-tests were used for the comparison of 2 means. Results were considered significantly if p-value < 0.05.

3. RESULTS

3.1. Evaluation of the stability of HbA1c in whole blood samples at 20-25°C

The baseline concentrations of HbA1c in whole blood samples of volunteers determined (T0) at room temperature on Standard F Analyzer (%HbA1c-S) and Erba XL640 system (%HbA1c-E) were in the range of 4.9-6 and 4.6-6.2%, respectively. Based on the results of the HbA1c test by two analytical methods, most of the volunteers in this study were healthy. Only one volunteer had %HbA1c near the threshold of 6.5%, so it is necessary to check the HbA1c level with another test method before diagnosing pre-diabetes (see table 1). The baseline levels of HbA1c-S (%HbA1c(T0)-S) and HbA1c-E (%HbA1c(T0)-E) were positively and strongly correlated with each other (r = 0.9996) (see figure 1).

Table 1. HbA1c levels at 20 – 25°C
%HbA1c(20 – 25°C)
Instrument Standard F Analyzer Erba XL640
Samples T0 T4h T12h T24h T0 T4h T12h T24h
1 6.5 6.3 6.6 6.5 6.2 6.4 6.5 6.4
2 5.1 5.1 5.4 5.2 4.9 4.9 5.0 5.0
3 5.6 5.3 5.7 5.5 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.2
4 5.8 5.5 5.6 5.9 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.4
5 5.0 4.9 4.9 5.0 4.6 4.7 4.6 4.7
6 5.0 4.9 5.2 5.3 4.7 4.6 4.5 4.7
7 5.6 5.9 5.7 5.5 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.5
8 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.7 4.8 4.7 4.8
9 5.2 5.1 5.2 5.0 4.6 5.0 4.9 5.1
10 5.2 5.0 5.1 5.1 4.8 4.9 4.8 4.9
Mean 5.39 5.29 5.43 5.39 5.03 5.11 5.08 5.17
SD 0.49 0.48 0.51 0.49 0.50 0.52 0.58 0.51
p-value * 0.11 0.38 1 0.10 0.32 0.01

T0: baseline; T4h: at 4 hours; T12h: at 12 hours; T24h: at 24 hours

p-value: compared to the baseline (T-test)

Download Excel Table
mpr-7-3-83-g1
Figure 1. Correlation between HbA1c(T0)-S and HbA1c(T0)-E levels at T0
Download Original Figure

The average concentrations of HbA1c of 10 volunteers stored at 20 - 25 °C were quantified at 4 hours, 12 hours and 24 hours, and compared with baseline levels (HbA1cT0). The results showed that the HbA1c-S concentrations remained stable for up to 24 hours, while the HbA1c-E concentrations were only stable for up to 12 hours compared to HbA1cT0 levels (p > 0.05). At 24h, the HbA1c-E concentrations were significantly different from the HbA1cT0 levels (p = 0.01 < 0.05) (see table 1).

However, %HbA1c-S and %HbA1c-E determined simultaneously on the same sample stored at 20-25 °C at T0, T2h, T4h and T24h were not significantly different (p > 0.05) (see figure 2).

mpr-7-3-83-g2
Figure 2. Comparison of %HbA1c determined simultaneously on Standard F Analyzer (blue) and Erba XL640 system (red) on the same sample stored at 20-25 °C at T0, T2h, T4h and T24h
Download Original Figure
3.2. Evaluation of the stability of HbA1c in whole blood samples at 2-8°C

The average concentrations of HbA1c of 10 volunteers stored at 2-8 °C were quantified on the first, second, and forth day, and compared with baseline levels (HbA1cT0). The results showed that the HbA1c-S concentration was stable under four days, while the HbA1c-E concentration was stable for less than 24 hours compared to HbA1cT0 levels (p =0.01 < 0.05). Therefore, %HbA1c-E was no longer determined at T2d and T4d. However, %HbA1c-S and %HbA1c-E determined simultaneously on the same sample stored at 2-8 °C at T1d was not significantly different (p >0.05) (see figure 3A).

mpr-7-3-83-g3
Figure 3. Comparison of %HbA1c determined simultaneously Standard F Analyzer (blue) and Erba XL640 system (red) on the same sample (A) stored at 2-8 °C for 1 day and (B) stored at -20 °C for 1 month
Download Original Figure
Table 2. HbA1c levels at 2 – 8°C
%HbA1c(2 – 8°C)
Instrument Standard F Analyzer Erba XL640
Samples T0 T1d T2d T4d T0 T1d T2d T4d
1 6.5 6.4 6.0 6.5 6.2 6.5 - -
2 5.1 5.0 5.2 5.3 4.9 5.0 - -
3 5.6 5.4 5.2 5.8 5.1 5.1 - -
4 5.8 5.4 5.5 5.7 5.3 5.4 - -
5 5.0 4.7 5.1 5.4 4.6 4.7 - -
6 5.0 5.0 5.1 5.3 4.7 4.6 - -
7 5.6 5.5 5.6 5.9 5.4 5.6 - -
8 4.9 4.9 4.9 5.0 4.7 4.9 - -
9 5.2 4.9 5.1 5.2 4.6 5.0 - -
10 5.2 5.5 5.7 5.4 4.8 4.9 - -
Mean 5.39 5.27 5.34 5.55 5.03 5.17 - -
SD 0.49 0.49 0.34 0.44 0.50 0.55 - -
p-value * 0.09 0.60 0.01 0.01 - -

T0: baseline; T1d: at day 1; T2d: at day 2; T4d: at day 4; (-): not determined

p-value: compared to the baseline (T-test)

Download Excel Table
3.3. Evaluation of the stability of HbA1c in whole blood samples at -20°C

The average concentrations of HbA1c of 10 volunteers stored at -20 °C were quantified at month 1, month 3 and compared with baseline levels (HbA1cT0). The results showed that the HbA1c-S concentration was stable under 3 months (p = 0.0003 < 0.05), while the HbA1c-E concentration was stable for less than 1 month compared to HbA1cT0 levels (p < 0.0001). Therefore, %HbA1c-E was no longer determined at T3m. %HbA1c-S and %HbA1c-E determined simultaneously on the same sample stored at -20 °C at T1m was significantly different (p = 0.003 < 0.05) (see figure 3B).

Table 3. HbA1c levels at –20°C
%HbA1c(–20 °C)
Instrument Standard F Analyzer Erba XL640
Samples T0 T1m T3m T0 T1m T3m
1 6.5 5.8 6.3 6.2 5.9 -
2 5.1 5.0 5.0 4.9 4.4 -
3 5.6 4.9 5.3 5.1 4.5 -
4 5.8 5.0 5.6 5.3 4.8 -
5 5.0 5.0 4.9 4.6 4.1 -
6 5.0 5.2 4.8 4.7 4.1 -
7 5.6 5.6 5.5 5.4 4.8 -
8 4.9 5.0 4.9 4.7 4.2 -
9 5.2 5.4 5.1 4.6 4.5 -
10 5.2 5.3 5.0 4.8 4.4 -
Mean 5.39 5.22 5.24 5.03 4.57 -
SD 0.49 0.30 0.46 0.50 0.53 -
p-value * 0.212 0.0003 < 0.0001 -

T0: baseline; T1m: at month 1; T3m: at month 3; (-): not determined

p-value: compared to the baseline (T-test)

Download Excel Table

4. DISCUSSION

HbA1c is one of the important indicators used to diagnose and monitor the effectiveness of diabetes treatment. Previous studies have shown that adverse sample storage conditions such as temperature changes and delayed time may affect the results of HbA1c quantification(14,15). In this study, we evaluated the influence of different temperatures on the stability of HbA1c as measured simultaneously by immunoassays on the HbA1c Standard F Analyser and Erba XL640 system.

The results showed that HbA1c-S levels were stable over 24 hours at 20 – 25 °C, under 4 days at 2 – 8 °C, and over 30 days at -20 °C. However, HbA1c-E levels were stable at under 24 hours at 20 – 25 °C, under 1 day at 2 – 8 °C and under 30 days at -20 °C. However, the average concentration of HbA1c-S at 20-25 °C and 2-8 °C at each time of survey was not statistically different from HbA1c-E at the same temperature, except at -20 °C (p < 0.05). Therefore, the HbA1c level measured on the HbA1c Standard F Analyser appeared to be more stable than on the Erba XL640 Analyser.

The baseline levels of HbA1c-S (%HbA1c(T0)-S) and HbA1c-E (%HbA1c(T0)-E) were positively and strongly correlated with each other. These results were similar to previous studies(15,16). Both immunoassay analyzers measured similar HbA1c levels at T0, which can be used to diagnose and monitor diabetes. The HbA1c immunoassays have high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy(17). However, immunoassays that indirectly measure %HbA1c based on total hemoglobin can cause an increase in %HbA1c(18). In addition, immunoturbidimetric methods using antiHbA1c may give false results for HbA1c because of the Hb variants present in the blood sample(19,20). However, HbA1c Standard F Analyser does not cause the interference with haemoglobin variants (HbS, HbE, HbC, HbD, HbF) and carbamylated haemoglobin(13).

Vargasa et al. found a difference in HbA1c results between immunoassays(12). Moreover, Karami et al. showed a large deviation in HbA1c concentration between enzymatic assays, boronate affinity chromatography compared with HPLC(21). These deviations can be caused by the calibration of the analyzer as well as the reagents, or by the different principles conducted by the analyzers(22). In this study, we found that the stability of HbA1c assessed by the two analysers was different.

Biological samples are recommended to be stored properly and transported to the laboratory for a short period of time for analysis. In fact, blood samples for HbA1c quantification are usually stored at 4 °C so that HbA1c can be measured within 24 hours 14. However, if it is not possible to quantify HbA1c immediately or if is necessary to save samples for future studies, the results of this study suggested that blood samples for HbA1c measurements should be stored at -20 °C or lower to prolong stability of HbA1c.

This study evaluated the stability of HbA1c under the influence of storage conditions and quantitative methods. In the further studies, the effect of storage conditions on the stability of normal and abnormal HbA1c levels may continue to be evaluated.

Conclusion

In this study, human whole blood samples for HbA1c determination can be stored for up to 1 month at -20°C.

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

Hb

Hemoglobin

%HbA1c-S

HbA1c levels determined on Standard F Analyzer

%HbA1c(T0)-E

Baseline levels of HbA1c-E

%HbA1c(T0)-S

Baseline levels of HbA1c-S

HPLC

High performance liquid chromatography

IA

Immunoassay

IgG

Immunoglobulin G

ISO

International Organization for Standardization

K2 EDTA

Tripotassium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid

SD

Standard deviation

ETHICAL STATEMENT

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City issued together with Decision No. 759/ÐHYD-HÐÐÐ October 20, 2022.

FUNDING

None to declare.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We would like to express our thanks to University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City and Buon Ma Thuot Medical Testing Center for their support in completing this study.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTION

Thuan Thi Minh Nguyen was head of the study group and edited the content. Dung Thi Van Nguyen analyzed the data.

REFERENCES

1.

Agarwal R. Measurement of errors in clinical laboratories. Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry. 2013; 28(3):227-234

2.

Plebani M. Diagnostic Errors and Laboratory Medicine – Causes and Strategies. Electronic Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. 2015; 26(1):7-14.

3.

Hedayati M, Razavi SA, Boroomand S, Kia SK. The impact of pre‐ analytical variations on biochemical analytes stability: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis. 2020; 34(12)e23551

4.

Flores CFY, Pineda ALMH, Bonilla VMC, Sáenz-Flor K. Sample Management: Stability of Plasma and Serum on Different Storage Conditions. Electronic Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. 2020; 31(1):46-55.

5.

Henriksen LO, Faber NR, Moller MF, Nexo E, Hansen AB. Stability of 35 biochemical and immunological routine tests after 10 hours storage and transport of human whole blood at 21°C. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation. 2014; 74(7):603-610

6.

Tambse V, Manoorkar GS, Banik M, Tambse M. Study of the stability of various biochemical analytes in pooled sera preserved at 4-8 °C. Asian Journal of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2015; 5(48):38-9

7.

Boyanton BLJ, Blick KE. Stability studies of twenty-four analytes in human plasma and serum. Clinical Chemistry. 2002; 48(12):2242-7

8.

Rioja RG, Espartosa DM, Segovia M, Ibarz M, Llopis MA, Bauça JM, et al. Laboratory sample stability. Is it possible to define a consensus stability function? An example of five blood magnitudes. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. 2018; 56(11):1806-1818

9.

World Health Organization. Use of anticoagulants in diagnostic laboratory investigations. Diagnostic Imaging and Laboratory Technology 2002. Available fromhttps://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/65957/WHO_DIL_LA B_99.1_REV.2.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.

10.

American Diabetes Association. Standard of medical are in diabetes-2022 Abridged for Primary Care Providers. Clinical Diabetes. 2022; 40(1):10-38

11.

Goya K, Tanaka S, Makio T, Kanno M, Tabuchi Y, Fukuzawa K, et al. HbA1c levels Measured by Enzymatic Assay and Immunoassay during Off-Site Health Checkups Are Both Lower than Those Measured by On-Site HPLC Assay. Kobe Journal of Medical Sciences. 2020; 66(5):E170-E174.

12.

Vargasa MG, Pazmino˜Gomeza BJ, Lorentia FEV, Condoa GMA, Neirab EIR, Veronc D, et al. Assessment of two glycated hemoglobin immunoassays. Endocrinol Diabetes Nutrition (Engl Ed). 2020; 67(5):297-303

14.

Niazpour F, Bandarian F, Nasli-Esfahani E, Ebrahimi R, Abdollahi M, Razi F. The effect of blood sample storage conditions on HbA1c concentration. Clinical Laboratory. 2019; 65(7):1-6

15.

Rohlfing CL, Hanson S, Tennill AL, Little RR. Effects of whole blood storage on hemoglobin A1c measurements with five current assay methods. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics. 2012; 14(3):271-275

16.

Rhea JM, Molinaro R. Pathology consultation on HbA1c methods and interferences. American journal of clinical pathology. 2004; 141(1):5-16

17.

Gupta S, Chauhan N, Jain U. Laboratory Diagnosis of HbA1c: A Review. Journal of Nanomedicine Research. 2017; 5(4):1-6

18.

Liu L, Hood S, Wang Y, Bezverkov R, Dou C, Datta A, et al. Direct enzymatic assay for %HbAlc in human whole blood samples. Clinical Biochemistry. 2008; 41:576-583

19.

Gunton JE, McElduff A. Heterozygous hemoglobin Hamadan affects HbA1c assay. Diabetes Care. 1999; 22(1):177

20.

Watanabe T, Kato K, Yamada D, Midorikawa S, Sato W, Shiga M, et al. A nondiabetic case of hemoglobin variant (Hb Nigiata) with inappropriately high and low HbA1c titers detected by different methods. Clin Chem. 1998; 44:1562-1564

21.

Karami A, Baradaran A. Comparative evaluation of three different methods for HbA1c measurement with High-performance liquid chromatography in diabetic patients. Advanced Biomedical Research. 2014; 3(94):6-10

22.

Johannes Roth, et al. Comparison of HbA1c measurements using 3 methods in 75 patients referred to one outpatient department. Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes. 2018; 126(1):23-26