Table 2: Evidences of content validity

	Sources of content validity evidences	Documented in FM POSCE
Downing et al., 2003 [1]	Proof that each of the SP cases fits into a detailed content blueprint of professionalism attributes	X
	Content-expert agreement that these specific cases are representative of professionalism relating cases in outpatient settings	X
	Expert clinical faculty have created, reviewed and revised the SP cases together with the checklists and ratings scales	X
	The SP cases were reviewed and critically critiqued and competently edited	X
	During the time of administration, the SP portrayals are monitored	X
Jonsson and Svingby, 2007 [4]	Rubric is used for qualitative rating of authentic work. Analytical scoring with anchors which use actual work samples improves validity	X