Original article

Direct cost of treatment in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction in Vietnam

Sy Van Hoanga, Tuan Thanh Trana, Kha Minh Nguyena,*
Author Information & Copyright
aDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at HCMC, 217 Hong Bang Street, District 5, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
*Address correspondence: Nguyen Minh Kha at the Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at HCMC, 217 Hong Bang Street, District 5, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; E-mails: minhkhaump@gmail.com

© Copyright 2019 MedPharmRes. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Apr 30, 2019; Revised: Oct 26, 2019; Accepted: Oct 28, 2019

Published Online: Dec 31, 2019

Abstract

Background:

Acute myocardial infarction has become a serious financial burden for patients, healthcare system, and society. It is therefore necessary to assess treatment cost of myocardial infarction that had been conducted in many countries in the world and still not fully analysed in Vietnam. Thus, we sought to describe acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction treatment cost and analyse related factors to acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction treatment cost.

Methods and Materials:

A retrospective cross-sectional study. Patients who was diagnosed by ST-elevation myocardial infarction at Cho Ray Hospital from June 2018 to February 2019, satisfied inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Results:

We collected 130 patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction with male: female ratio of 3:1, at average age of mean ± Standard deviation (SD) = 62.9 ± 12.6. The length of stay in hospital was mean ± SD = 7.1 ± 3.3 days and the median direct cost of MI was 68,902,500 VND (interquartile range (IQR): 5,737,200 – 104,266,000 VND). The average total cost of acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the percutaneous coronary intervention group was more than 16 times as the conservative group. The treatment strategies and hospital complications were major factors that affected treatment cost.

Conclusion:

The median direct cost of acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction was accounted for 68,902,500 VND. Complications directly affected costs.

Keywords: Myocardial infarction; cost; treatment

1. INTRODUCTION

Acute myocardial infarction (MI) remains one of the leading causes of death in the world general and in Vietnam, in particular [1]. MI is increasingly becoming an important public health problem. The importance of the disease was characterized by its high prevalence and serious clinical consequences, which in turn lead to increase in treatment cost and medical burden [2]. Acute MI is divided into subgroups of ST-elevation MI (STEMI) and non-ST-elevation MI. STEMI account for about 40% of cases of acute MI in the ACTION (the Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry) study (GWTG) [3]. In the United States, the median cost for all patients hospitalized in 2009 was $19,349 ([IQR] = $14,660 – $26,282) [4]. According to the research by Tran et al in 2012 at Nguyen Trai hospital, the mean cost for treatment of MI was 15,589,361 VND [5]. In 2017, Nguyen et al reported that mean cost for STEMI patients was 69,899,677 VND at Ho Chi Minh City Heart Institute [6].

In addition, the application of advanced treatments such as percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and using new generation of fibrinolytic agents also increased treatment cost [2]. Many serious complications may occur such as arrhythmias, heart failure, and hospital infections. When these complications occurred that significantly increased the length of stay in hospital. All contributed to increase treatment cost [7]. A study that reveals treatment cost helps us assess medical fee, which patients have to pay. It is therefore necessary to choose an effective and economic treatment strategy for patients. Thus, in this study, we sought to describe acute ST-elevation MI treatment cost and analyze related factors to acute ST-elevation MI treatment cost at Cho Ray Hospital.

2. MATERIALS AND METHOD

2.1. Study design

This retrospective cross-sectional study was performed at Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, between June 2018 to February 2019.

2.1.1. Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria were the admitted patients who diagnosed with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction based on Third Universal definition of MI [8]. Medical reports had all needed information for the study.

The exclusion criteria were the patients who was diagnosed with therapy, had to be required complications and heathcare associated infections at another hospital before transferred to Cho Ray Hospital.

2.1.2. Study variables

Baseline demographic (age, gender, length of stay, Killip classification, location of MI, and left ventricular ejection fraction), complications, and therapy strategies including PCI or conservative treatment were recorded. Total direct cost were the sum of PCI cost, medication cost, bed cost, and laboratory cost. These costs are recorded from the bill declaring the patient’s treatment cost during the hospital stay. These costs are not deducted from social insurance payment. Currency unit was Vietnamese Dong (VND).

2.2. Ethical Statement

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Cho Ray Hospital. Patient information was kept confidential. Informed consent was not required for this study.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Data was analyzed using Stata statistics version 13 for Windows (StataCorp. 2013. Stata Statistical Software: Release 13. Collage Station, TX: StataCorp LP). Continuous variables were expressed as the mean ± Standard deviation (SD) for normal distribution or the median (interquartile range) for non normal distribution, and compared using the Student t test or MannWhitney test as appropriate. Nominal variables were compared by Pearson chi-square analysis. A p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. RESULTS

From June 2018 through February 2019, a total of 130 patients admitted to Cho Ray Hospital, met the inclusion criteria of the study.

Baseline characteristics

The mean (SD) age of the research population was 62.9 (12.6) years. In which, male patients (93 patients; accounting for 71.5%) were 3 times more than female patients (37 patients; accounting for 28.5%). The median left ventricular ejection fraction was 41% ([IQR]: 35 – 50%). The proportion of patients evaluated when at admission and categorized in each Killip class (I, II, III and IV) were 87.7%, 3.8%, 2.1%, and 5.4%, respectively. Anterior MI patients had the highest proportion of the location of MI (n = 84; 64.6%), then inferior MI patients (n = 42; 32.3%), and other patients (n = 4; 3.1%). Table 1 revealed some clinical characteristics between the PCI group and the conservative group. The median total costs for STEMI treatment was 68,902,500 ([IQR]; 57,372,000 – 104,266,000) VND as shown in Table 2.

Table 1. Clinical characteristics between the PCI group and the conservative group
Clinical parameters All N = 130 PCI group n = 110 Conservative group n = 20 p value
Age, years 62.9 ± 12.9 61.8 ± 12.0 66.9 ± 13.9 0.09*
Male, n (%) 93 (71.5) 81 (73.6) 12 (60.0) 0.21**
Killip I, n (%) 114 (87.7) 102 (92.7) 8 (66.7) 0.001 **
Anterior wall, n (%) 84 (64.6) 71 (64.6) 13 (65.0) 0.96**
Ejection Fraction, % 42.2 ± 11.5 41.8 ± 11.2 42.7 ± 12.2 0.74*
Length of stay, days 7.1 ± 3.3 7.3 ± 3.4 5.3 ± 2.4 0.01 *

Values were mean ± SD or n (%).

* : Student’s t-test

** : Chi-squared test

Download Excel Table
Table 2. Costs for STEMI treatment (N = 130)
Cost (VND) Median Interquartile 25th Interquartile 75th Average
Bed cost 1 522 500 1 087 000 2 299 000 1 952 077
Laboratory cost 2 015 500 1 518 000 2 648 000 2 236 208
Medication cost 1 848 500 1 368 000 2 587 000 2 861 785
PCI cost 56 715 000 45 932 000 81 421 000 62 212 960
Total cost 68 902 500 57 372 000 104 266 000 77 964 850
Download Excel Table

In particular, the total direct cost of the PCI group was 16 times higher than that of the conservative group (91,107,810 vs 5,678,550 VND). Bed cost was about 2 times higher in the PCI group than in the conservative group. Other costs were approximately equal between the two groups (Figure 1).

mpr-3-3-7-g1
Figure 1. Cost and treatment strategies (values were mean)
Download Original Figure
Cost and Complications

Among 130 patients, 14 (10.8%) developed complications: hospital-acquired infection (n = 8), cardiogenic shock (n = 3), and arrhythmia (n = 3).

Clinical characteristics among with and without complications group were shown in Table 3. In particular, the rate of Killip I was 91.4% in patients without complications and higher than in patients with complications (57.1%), p = 0.001. When complications occurred, the length hospital of stay was significantly increased (p = 0.02) and costs also increased.

Table 3. Clinical characteristics in with and without complications group.
Clinical parameters All N = 130 Non-Complications n = 116 Complications n = 14 p value
Age, years 62.9 ± 12.9 62.9 ± 12.7 63.0 ± 12.3 0.97*
Male, n (%) 93 (71.5) 83 (71.2) 10 (71.4) 0.92**
Killip I, n (%) 114 (87.7) 106 (91.4) 8 (57.1) 0.001 **
Anterior wall, n (%) 84 (64.6) 77 (66.4) 7 (50) 0.22**
Ejection Fraction, % 42.2 ± 11.5 42.6 ± 11.3 38.6 ± 12.3 0.21*
Length of stay, days 7.09 ± 3.27 6.9 ± 2.4 8.8 ± 5.4 0.02 *

Values were mean ± SD or n (%)

* : Student’s t-test

** : Chi-squared test

Download Excel Table

The total cost in the complications group was higher than uncomplicated. For instance, the laboratory cost increased by about 1.5 times; the bed cost increased about 2 times, and the cost of medication treatment increased by about 3 times (Figure 2).

mpr-3-3-7-g2
Figure 2. Cost and Complications (values were mean)
Download Original Figure

4. DISCUSSION

The average age of research population was similar to the research by Nguyen et al (2017) at Ho Chi Minh City Heart Institute (62.9 and 65.6 years) [6]. We revealed that the length of stay would increase with percutaneous coronary intervention group because patients had been undergone a procedure, so patients need to be followed-up after PCI proceduce. Similarly, when patients had complications, the length of stay would increase. The length of stay for STEMI treatment in the study was mean ± SD = 7.1 ± 3.3 days shorter than in the study by Nguyen et al which was 9.31 ± 6.18 days [6]; Tran was 15 ± 7 days [5]. This might be due to inpatient-overload condition at Cho Ray Hospital, patients were transferred to satellite hospitals. Clearly, the direct cost of acute MI treatment was increased over time. Comparion between total cost in these studies was shown in Figure 3.

mpr-3-3-7-g3
Figure 3. Comparison total cost between hospitals (VND)
Download Original Figure

Based on strategy, the total cost in the PCI group (84.6% of patients) was about 16 times higher than the conservation group (16.5%). This result was consistent with the result of Nguyen et al (15 times) [6]. When complications occurred during hospital stay, the length of stay increased significantly. In 2015, Nguyen et al reported that mean costs of AMI were $2,503 (approximately 55,066,000 VND) per hospitalization at a regional hospital in Vietnam [9].

According to the World Bank, the average income per capita of the whole country in 2017 was 2,342 USD (approximately 51,524,000 VND) [10]. With such direct treatment costs, patients without social insurance must pay a huge economic burden when they admitted hospital for STEMI treatment. Compared with other diseases, Tran et al (2018) estimated the direct total cost of treating an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was 7,605,500 VND. If accompanied with pneumonia, this cost was 21,893,000 VND [11]. The cost for STEMI treatment was higher than COPD treatment.

It is clearly that PCI compared with conservative treatment was associated with a lower mortality in patients with STEMI. The median total cost of the PCI group (Figure 1) was significantly higher than the conservative group. Costs also increased when complications occurred. This study did not analyse the cost-effectiveness aspest of STEMI treatment. The study only revealed the cost of contemporary STEMI treatment in Vietnam and emphasized optimal treatment for preventing complications that the hospitalization costs would be reduced.

Limitation of study

The study had a limitation. Total economic burden of illness of STEMI are categorized into two unique components, including direct and indirect costs. The authors only assessed direct costs and could not analyze indirect costs such as transportation costs and productivity losses.

5. CONCLUSION

This study revealed that the direct total cost of STEMI treatment per hospitalization was high. The costs of STEMI treatment were significantly different among strategies. Complications directly affected the costs. So optimal treatment prevents complications that can reduce the costs of treatment in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors would like to thank the staffs at Cho Ray Hospital for their assistance in data extraction.

DECLARATION OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

REFERENCES

1.

Nguyen HL, Nguyen QN, Ha DA, et al. Prevalence of comorbidities and their impact on hospital management and short-term outcomes in Vietnamese patients hospitalized with a first acute myocardial infarction. PLoS One. 2014; 9(10)e108998

2.

Kolansky DM. Acute coronary syndromes: morbidity, mortality, and pharmacoeconomic burden. Am J Manag Care. 2009; 15(2):36-41.

3.

Lloyd-Jones D, Adams RJ, Brown TM, et al. Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics--2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010; 21(7):948-954

4.

Krumholz HM, Chen J, Murillo JE, et al. Clinical correlates of in-hospital costs for acute myocardial infarction in patients 65 years of age and older. Am Heart J. 1998; 135(3):523-31

5.

Tran TV, Tran TQ, Nguyen NT. Total Average Cost Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction At Nguyen Trai Hospital From January 2009 To December 2009. Y Hoc TP. Ho Chi Minh. 2012; 16(1):142-50.

6.

Nguyen TNT, Tran APB, Luong TNT. Analysis of the cost treatment of myocardial infarction at Ho Chi Minh city Heart Institute. Y Hoc TP. Ho Chi Minh. 2017; 21(1)e300.

7.

Zhao Z, Winget M. Economic burden of illness of acute coronary syndromes: medical and productivity costs. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011; 11e35

8.

Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2012; 126(16):2020-2035

9.

Nguyen TP, Nguyen T, Postma M. Economic Burden Of Acute Myocardial Infarction In Vietnam. Value Health. 2015; 18(7)a389

10.

The World Bank. GPD per capita in 2017. http://www.data.worldbank.org [Accessed on 20 February 2019]. .

11.

Tran NV, Le TV, D VG. Cost Treatment Of Acute Exacerbation Of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease With And Without Pneumonia. Y Hoc TP. Ho Chi Minh. 2018; 22(2)e194.