PDF Download
PubReader
Export Citation
Email the Author
Share Facebook
Share Twitter
Cited by 0 Article
Metrics (View:540)
1. INTRODUCTION
Antibiotic resistance has been determined as a global threat [1-6]. Inappropriate use of antibiotics is determined as a crucial driver of the evolution of resistance [1-3]. It leads to longer hospital stays, higher medical costs, and increased mortality [2, 7, 8]. Therefore, using antibiotics properly is crucial in treatment and reducing the burden of the diseases.
Over the 15-year period from 2000 to 2015, overall use of antibiotics per capita as the first-line medicine increased by 26.2% worldwide [1]. The utilization of antibiotics in the elderly (≥60 years old) tended to increase [9]. A study in Spain revealed that the consumption of antibiotics among the elderly rose significantly between 2003 and 2014 in both sexes, averaging 5.6% per year in men and 6.2% in women. This increase was related to education, marital status, income, lifestyle, examination in medical centers, and disability status [10]. Vietnam is ranked as one of the top countries with a high proportion of antibiotic resistance in Asia [11, 12]. Antibiotics accounted for more than 50.0% of medicines for treatment in Vietnam, and it was commonly sold by community pharmacies, however, from 88.0 to 97.0% of the medicines were distributed without a prescription although it is forbidden [13, 14].
Increasing age is a natural process in humans. It has been determined as a risk factor for diseases. A cross-sectional study of 2400 people aged 60 and older indicated that chronic disease was present in 76.7% of the participants with 39.2% classified as living with multimorbidity. The popular comorbidities among the elderly included cardiovascular disease, digestive diseases, respiratory diseases (chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases, tuberculosis), arthritis, genitourinary, and diabetes[15]. The chronic diseases could lead to or combine with a variety of infections, respiratory infection in particular [7, 16]. It could be enhanced by the changes that gradually appeared along with the age such as weakening of the immune system, impaired function of the skin, mucous barrier, or impaired respiratory system function, etc. [7, 17-20]. Therefore, it is important to describe the situation of antibiotic usage among the elderly to provide scientific evidence for health service planning and policy makers. The current epidemiological studies in Vietnam were mainly conducted in children under five or general population [21-23]. Therefore, this study aimed to describe the situation of antibiotic usage among the elderly.
2. MATERIALS AND METHOD
This study was conducted in Tan Loi commune, Dong Hy district, Thai Nguyen province. Tan Loi is a midland mountainous commune located in the Southeastern part of the district. According to an official report of the district in April 2019, the population was 5064 people (49.3% female). There were nearly 500 elderly people accounted for approximately 10.0% of the population.
A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted from April to September 2020. Elderly people from 60 years of age and above, who did not suffer from any hearing, speech, or mental disorders and had a permanent address in the study setting were invited to participate in the study.
An interviewer-administered questionnaire was performed to gather data regarding antibiotic usage among the elderly. The questionnaire consisted of two parts including baseline characteristics and antibiotic usage among participants. The questionnaire was initially written in Vietnamese in lay language. The initial questionnaire was reviewed by an expert in Epidemiology and an expert in Community Health. After that, it was performed by 30 participants to check for the completion and overall interview duration before implementation. There were not any tests performed to test the questionnaire.
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Thai Nguyen University of Medicine and Pharmacy (No. 576/ÐHYD-HÐÐÐ).
The sample size was determined according to the formula to the estimated proportion in a descriptive study [24]:
The sample size was calculated using a proportion of people buying antibiotics using their prescriptions at 40.0% [21] with 5.0% marginal error and 95% confidence. The required sample size was 370.
Simple random sampling method was performed. The participants were randomly selected using the list of elderly people which was provided by the local health station. The list was originally grouped by villages including cardinal numbers from 1 to the end. Sample function in R was utilized to randomly select the participants. The participants were recruited after receiving their agreements to participate in the study.
Descriptive statistics were performed to describe variables including frequency, percentage. Associations between prescription usage and independent variables were assessed by univariate/multivariate logistic regression. The independent variables included in the analysis were gender, age group, ethnic, education level, occupation, chronic disease, economic status, family size, others help to buy medicines, locations to buy medicine, obtained information related to antibiotic uses. All significant factors in univariate analysis were included in multivariate analysis by purposeful selection. Statistically significant was set at 0.05. Data analysis was performed using R.
3. RESULTS
Overall, 370 participants participated in the study. The baseline characteristics are illustrated in Table 1. More than half of the participants were female (55.7%). Kinh ethnicity was 39.7%. The majority of participants were farmers or workers (62.7%). Education level of participants included college or above (12.2%), high school (28.6%), secondary school (42.2%), and primary school (17.0%). A large proportion of participants were living with their husband/wife (78.1%). The percentage of the participants suffering from at least one chronic disease was 84.3% (including hypertension, COPD, tuberculosis, asthma, coronary heart diseases).
A large proportion of participants normally bought antibiotics without a prescription (60.8%). The participants normally bought the medicines the same as the previous (53.0%) or followed advices from medicine sellers (44.9%) and relatives/friends (15.4%). More than half of the participants bought antibiotics themselves (57.8%). Local private pharmacies and health centers/hospitals were common locations for buying antibiotics, 63.8% and 34.1% respectively (Table 2).
Most people took antibiotics after meals (75.4%), the remaining ways only accounted for less than 25.0% in total. The proportion of the elderly who took antibiotics as the seller’s instructions was 63.8%, followed by their physician’s guidance (37.6%). The percentage of participants who stopped taking antibiotics themselves when the symptoms are gone was 54.1%, followed by a doctor’s prescription (21.1%) and seller’s instructions (24.3%).
Regarding instructions for doses, the participants were likely to take it from medicine sellers (63.8%). In case they forgot to take a dose of antibiotics, some of them would immediately take the forgotten dose as soon as they could remember (52.7%), or skip that dose and continue to take the next dose (41.9%). A double dose would be taken for the next time (5.4%).
A majority of participants took medicines with plain water (74.6%), the rest drunk with tea/milk/fruit juice (25.4%). Antipyretic/painkiller was the most commonly used with antibiotics (64.6%), followed by traditional medicine (28.6%), and flu medicine (10.3%). Only 24.1% of the elderly took antibiotics without any other medicines (Table 3).
More than 50.0% of the participants would change to more expensive antibiotics if the symptoms not released after using antibiotics. When experiencing undesirable symptoms, the participants often went to doctors (48.1%), stopped taking medicines (27.0%), bought other medicines themselves, or continued taking the current medicines (Table 4).
Results from univariate/multivariate analysis revealed the factors associated with prescription usage among the elderly (details were presented in Table 5). Gender and age were not associated with the use of prescriptions when buying antibiotics. The elderly who are ethnic minorities were 2.26 times more likely to use prescriptions than the Kinh (OR = 2.26, 95%CI 1.45-3.53). Elderly people who are from high school or above were more likely to use prescriptions to buy antibiotics than those with lower education level (OR = 2.42, 95%CI 1.58-3.72). Occupation was also a significantly associated factor, the elderly who are farmers were less likely to use prescriptions when buying antibiotics compared to other occupations (OR = 1.71, 95%CI 1.11-2.63). The elderly who buy medicines themselves were more likely to use prescriptions compared to those who had to ask others for help (OR = 3.11, 95%CI 1.97, 4.89). The elderly who have been educated about antibiotics often used prescriptions than those who have never been educated or not remembered (OR = 3.99, 95%CI 2.57 - 6.22). Multivariate analysis demonstrated significant factors associated with prescription usage such as ethnic group occupation, locations to buy antibiotics, and the individuals who buy the medicines. Locations to buy antibiotics strongly associated with prescription use (OR= 6302.6, 95%CI 617.4 – 64336.6) after adjusted for ethnic group, education level, occupation, other helps to buy medicine, and obtained information related to antibiotic uses.
4. DISCUSSION
The respondents who used antibiotics according to prescription accounted for 39.2%. This proportion was slightly lower than a study conducted in adults by Tran The Hoang in Thai Nguyen province showing that 40.0% bought medicines using prescription[21]. The proportion was much higher than a study conducted in Iran among the elderly showing that the proportion of self-medication was more than 80.0%, which meant only about 20.0% purchased medicines using prescriptions[25]. The real proportion of non-prescription medicine purchases in the community can be higher due to the high proportion of non-prescription sales in retail pharmacies (from 62.1% to 70.0%) [26, 27], or in a study conducted in Vietnam in 2014 revealed that 88.0% antibiotics sold in rural pharmacies were without a prescription [28]. The purchase of antibiotics without prescriptions as well as the improper use not only affects the current treatment but also leads to consequences in the future by increasing the risk of antibiotic resistance/multidrug resistance [2]. It is even more serious that medicine sellers and customers’ knowledge of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance were low, particularly in rural areas [28]. Thus, the patients might suffer from a higher burden of severer infections and complications, longer hospital stays, and higher medical costs in following episodes [2, 7, 8]. In addition, the arbitrary use of medicines without prescriptions can be associated with undesirable effects. Therefore, interventions should concentrate on health education programs as well as enhancing the enforcement of current regulations regarding appropriate antibiotic usage.
The adverse effects reported by the participants including diarrhea (24.9%), headache (5.4%). The proportion of taking antibiotics with allergies accounted for 53.5%. This proportion was much higher than the previous study conducted in adults [21], it is probably from different assessments of the elderly on allergy symptoms, and the higher frequency of diseases and antibiotic use among the elderly[29].
Most participants bought antibiotics from local private pharmacies (63.8%), local health stations/hospitals (34.1%), and only 2.2% from private clinics. These percentages were different from the study of Nguyen Thi Thanh which indicated 43.6% getting from private pharmacy [30]. Besides, the participant’s assessment of how easy to buy antibiotics was easy/very easy accounted for over 90.0% and all of them reported that their neighbors normally bought antibiotics on their own. This is clear evidence that interventions are needed to improve knowledge and practice in buying antibiotics not only for the elderly but also for health service providers, especially for private pharmacies. This plays a major role while Vietnam is one of the top countries with a high proportion of antibiotic resistance in Asia [2, 11, 12].
There were significant relationships between educational levels, ethnicity and antibiotics use among the elderly. Accordingly, those with education levels from high school or higher (OR = 2.42, 95% CI 1.58-3.72) tend to use prescription to buy antibiotics compared to those with lower education levels. This result was consistent with Faranak Jafari et al. showing that both gender and education level associated with self-medication (without prescription) [25]. It could be because those with high education can obtain and have better knowledge about antibiotic usage, thereby partly reflecting the more appropriate behavior of using antibiotics. However, this study showed that there was no relationship between sex and behavior of prescription use. This result agreed with Tran The Hoang et al. showing that there was no difference in medicine purchase with/without prescription in Thai Nguyen, Vietnam [21]. The difference could be due to distinguished social features regarding gender between Vietnam and Iran.
Notably, the respondents who are minority ethnic tended to use prescriptions compared to the Kinh (OR = 2.26, 95% CI 1.45-3.53). This result was in contrast to some other studies [21]. This may be due to the easier accessibility of the majority ethnic group and the inadequate habit of using antibiotics.
There was a statistically significant relationship between occupation and prescription use, elderly farmers were less likely to use prescriptions when buying antibiotics than in other occupations (OR = 1.71, 95%CI 1.11-2.63). It could be an interactive relationship, as the majority of workers and civil servants and retirees tend to have higher education levels than the farmer, so their behavior might be healthier. This result was also consistent with the study of Tran Van Long showing that: antibiotic use behaviors of employees were better than farmers with OR = 1.49 and p <0.05 [31]. This is consistent with Health Belief Model: having good knowledge, good attitude, practice will be better [32]. In addition, the results from this study also showed that the elderly who have been educated about antibiotics also use prescriptions more often than those who have never heard or not remember (OR = 3.99, 95%CI 2.57 - 6.22).
This study utilized the quantitative cross-sectional study design to describe the pattern of antibiotic usage among the elderly. However, it was conducted in a commune in a rural area in the Northern mountainous region of Vietnam. Therefore, the results from this study may not be generalized for the elderly in Vietnam. It is needed to conduct a larger-scale study and identify further characteristics of antibiotic usage such as types of antibiotics, frequency, etc. In addition, qualitative study design should be combined to achieve better understanding regarding antibiotic usage as well as barriers in antibiotic usage among the elderly.
Conclusion
The proportion of the elderly using antibiotics with a prescription was low. The majority of the participants bought antibiotics from the local private pharmacies. The main source of information to buy antibiotics was as the last time of antibiotic purchase and medicine sellers. After taking doses of antibiotics, if the symptoms did not release, the elderly tended to change to more expensive ones. A large proportion of participants stopped taking antibiotics after the symptoms were gone. Some factors significantly associated with prescription use were education level, ethnicity, obtained information related to antibiotic uses, individuals who buy the medicines.
