MedPharmRes
University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City
Original article

The efficiency of combining modified acupuncture and motor relearning method on post-stroke patients

Minh-Man Pham Buia, Van-Dan Nguyena, Hoai-Nam Thaib, Dieu-Thuong Thi Trinha,*
aFaculty of Traditional Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
bUniversity Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
*Address correspondence: Assoc. Prof., Dr. Trinh Thi Dieu Thuong at Faculty of Traditional Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; E-mails: thuong.ttd@ump.edu.vn

© Copyright 2019 MedPharmRes. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Jan 08, 2019; Revised: Feb 13, 2019; Accepted: Mar 04, 2019

Published Online: May 31, 2019

Abstract

Background and Objectives:

Combining modern medicine and traditional medicine in the rehabilitation of post-stroke motor deficit has shown interesting results. Many studies on modified acupuncture, a combination of modern and traditional techniques, have proven its effectiveness in motor rehabilitation in post-stroke patients. Furthermore, the effectiveness of the motor relearning method in the treatment of post-stroke paralysis has been elucidated. Therefore, our study aims to determine whether the combination between modified acupuncture and motor relearning method can improve treatment outcomes.

Method:

Multicenter randomized controlled trial (Traditional Medicine Hospital of Ho Chi Minh City, General Hospital of Soc Trang Province, and People Military Hospital of Soc Trang Province) from July 2014 to July 2015. 66 post-stroke patients were divided into two groups: The control group received modified acupuncture combined with Bobath method, and the trial group received modified acupuncture combined with motor relearning method. After six weeks, patients were evaluated according to the Barthel score, the 10-hole test, and the ability to walk.

Results:

The trial group showed better results than the control group. There was a significant difference between the two groups in the Barthel score and the ability to walk, excluding the 10-hole test. After treatment, 77.42% of patients in the trial group showed improvement compared to only 51.61% in the control group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion:

The combination of modified acupuncture and motor relearning method is more effective than the combination of modified acupuncture and Bobath method in the rehabilitation of motor deficit after stroke.

Keywords: Modified acupuncture; Motor relearning; Bobath; Barthel score; 10-hole test

1. INTRODUCTION

According to the World Health Organization, 15 million people suff stroke worldwide each year. Within this number, five million die and another five million are permanently disabled [12]. In Vietnam, about 200,000 stroke patients are recorded per year, in which 51.9% suff from the motor deficit [6]. The combination of modern medicine and traditional medicine in the rehabilitation of motor deficit after stroke has shown interesting results. Many studies on modifi acupuncture, a combination of modern and traditional techniques, have proven its effectiveness in motor rehabilitation in post-stroke patients [10, 11]. Modifi acupuncture is quite similar to neuromuscular electrical stimulation. However, the neuromuscular electrical stimulation does not perform percutaneously; therefore, it is difficult to aff the inner muscles and contract selective muscles. Furthermore, many studies have elucidated the effectiveness of the motor relearning method in the treatment of post-stroke paralysis [3, 5]. Therefore, this study aims to determine whether the combination of modifi acupuncture and motor relearning method can improve the treatment results.

2. METHOD

Our study was a multicenter randomized controlled trial conducting on 66 post-stroke patients at Traditional Medicine Hospital of Ho Chi Minh City, General Hospital of Soc Trang Province, and People Military Hospital of Soc Trang Province from July 2014 to July 2015. This study was approved by Ethics Board in Biomedical Research at University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City.

The inclusion criteria were: the patients had to be fully aware and cooperative, their Barthel scores were ≤ 60 and they agreed to participate in the research. Stroke patients with ulceration, inflammation or cachexia due to lengthy lying on bed, or those who had complicated changes that needed other treatments during the research process were excluded.

The follwing variables were collected: Barthel score, Barthel rank, 10-hole test in one minute and three minutes for upper limbs, the ability to walk for lower limbs. patients were divided into two group randomly by Graphpad Software. The control group received modifed acupuncture and the Bobath method, which where current methods using in the researched hospitals, while the trial group received modified acupuncture and motor relearning program.

Modified acupuncture comprised three steps. Step one: Identifying weak or paralyzed muscles. Step two: Three pairs of acupoints were selected on both ends of the weak or paralyzed muscles, three pairs on the upper limb and three pairs on the lower limb. Step three: patients were given electro-acupuncture in 20 minutes. This process was conducted 1 time/day from Monday to friday until finishing 30 days of treatment.

Patients in the control group did exercises with 4 different positions including lying position (rolling onto paralyzed slide, rolling onto healed side, exercising paralyzed arm, paralyzed leg, paralyzed shoulder, and putting weight on leg, etc.), sitting position (sitting up, balancing while sitting, moving with buttocks, moving from bed to chair, controlling torso, exercising arm, and exercising leg), standing position (putting weight on non-paralyzed leg, putting weight on paralyzed leg, and exercising torso), and walking exercise [9].

Patients in the trial group did 4 specific tasks, including balancing, walking, standing up-sitting down, and reaching-manipulation. In each task, the exercises were conducted based on patients’ ability and performance. Every day, patients did the four exercises at least once, and the tasks were repeated based on the patients health status. Before exercising, patients were checked for vital signs. If the blood pressure was higher than 140/90 mmHg, they would not exercise that day [1, 2].

Every 10 days of treatment, patients were checked for vital signs, such as Barthel score, Barthel rank, were tested the ability to walk, and did the 10-hole test in one and three minutes.

Data were processed by Microsoft Excel 2007, and analyzed by STATA 10.0. We used the chi-square test to compare the patients’ status before treatment, to compare the ability to walk between two groups before and after treatment. The t-test was used to compare the treatment effects in upper limbs rehabilitation per 1 minute and 3 minutes, the Barthel score in each period of time between two groups and paired t-test was used to compare the treatment effects in upper limbs rehabilitation per 1 minute and 3 minutes, the Barthel score before and after treatment in each group.

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in population traits, stroke histories, and accompanying diseases (Table 1 and Table 2).

Table 1. Population traits and stroke history of the two groups
Population traits and Stroke history Control group Trial group
No. % No. %
Age
  < 50 years old 5 15.15 6 18.18
  ≥ 50 years old 28 84.85 27 81.82
Gender
  Female 19 57.58 16 48.48
  Male 14 42.42 17 51.52
Time period from suffering stroke to treatment
  ≤ 1 month
  > 1 month 23 69.70 22 66.67
Coma 10 30.30 11 33.33
  NO
  Yes 30 90.91 31 93.94
Time of stroke 3 9.09 2 6.06
  1st time
  ≥ 2nd time 26 78.79 27 81.82
7 21.21 6 18.18

No statistically significant difference between the two groups (p > 0.05, chi-square test)

Download Excel Table
Table 2. Population traits and stroke history of the two groups
Accompanying diseases Control group Trial group
No. % No. %
Hypertension
  No 5 15.15 6 18.18
  Yes 28 84.85 27 81.82
Cardiovascular diseases
  No 27 81.82 24 72.73
  Yes 6 18.18 9 27.27
Diabetes
  No 26 78.79 25 75.76
  Yes 7 21.21 8 24.24
Obesity
  No 26 78.79 25 75.76
  Yes 7 21.21 8 24.24
Dyslipidemia
  No 17 51.52 18 54.55
  Yes 16 48.48 15 45.45

No statistically significant difference between the two groups (p > 0.05, chi-square test)

Download Excel Table

Concerning upper limbs rehabilitation, both groups showed good results after treatment. The rings when doing the 10-hole test in one and three minutes of both groups were increased signifi (P < 0.0001). However, there was no statistically signifi diff between the two groups (P > 0.05) (Table 3, Figure 1, and Figure 2).

Table 3. Treatment effects: upper limbs rehabilitation
T Control group Trial group P value
Mean SD Mean SD
1 min Rings Rings
  1st day 0.3 1.04 0.57 1.87 0.47
  10th day 1.72 3.62 1.64 3.69 0.92
  20th day 3.79 5.91 4.12 5.89 0.82
  30th day 7 8.62 8.9 9.12 0.4
Difference between 1st day and 30th day P = 0.0002 P < 0.0001
3 mins Rings Rings
  1st day 1.09 2.68 1.6 5.51 0.63
  10th day 3.81 6.9 4.45 10.58 0.77
  20th day 8.12 11.67 10.6 16.08 0.48
  30th day 17.09 22.19 22.16 24.65 0.34
Difference between 1st day and 30th day P = 0.0004 P = 0.0001
Download Excel Table
mpr-3-1-17-g1
Figure 1: Treatment effects in upper limbs rehabilitation per 1 min
Download Original Figure
mpr-3-1-17-g2
Figure 2: Treatment effectiveness in upper limbs rehabilitation per 3 min Both groups showed statistically significant differences in the l0-hole test in one minute and three minutes between the 1st day and the 30th day with P < 0.05 (paired t-test). However, there was no statistically significant differences in l0-hole test in one minute and three minutes between two groups (P > 0.05, t-test).
Download Original Figure

Concerning upper limbs rehabilitation, both groups showed good results after treatment. The rings when doing the 10-hole test in one and three minutes of both groups were increased significantly (P < 0.0001). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05) (Table 3, Figure 1, and Figure 2).

Concerning lower limbs rehabilitation, both groups showed good results after treatment. The patients’ walking competencies of both groups were increased significantly (P < 0.05). However, the trial group showed statistically significantly better results in lower limbs rehabilitation than the control group after 30 days of treatment (P < 0.05) (Table 4, Figure 3).

Table 4. Treatment effects: upper limbs rehabilitation
Control group Trial group P value
No % No. %
1st day
  can walk 4 12.12 8 24.24 0.202
  cannot walk 29 87.88 25 75.76
30th day
  can walk 21 63.64 30 90.91 0.017
  cannot walk 12 36.36 3 9.09
Download Excel Table
mpr-3-1-17-g3
Figure 3: Treatment effectiveness on lower limbs rehabilitation There was no statistically significant di.fference between the proportion of patients who can walk before treatment in control group and in trial group (P > 0.05, chi-square test). Also, there was no statistically significant di.fference between the proportion of patients who cannot walk before treatment in control group and in trial group (P > 0.05, chi-square test). However, the proportions of patients who can/cannot walk after treatment in control group and in trial group were statistically significantly di.fferent (P < 0.05, chi-square test).
Download Original Figure

Concerning general rehabilitation after treatment, both groups showed good results (P < 0.0001). However, the trial group showed statistically different better results in general rehabilitation than the control group after 30 days of treatment (P < 0.05). The total patients’ score and the patients’ rate in Good-Fair rank were increased significantly (P < 0.0001) (Table 5, Figure 4, and Figure 5).

Table 5. General rehabilitation according to the Barthel score
Barthel score Control group Trial group P value
Mean SD Mean SD
1st day 33.03 10.07 33.93 10.81 0.725
10th day 41.51 11.62 44.24 12.51 0.362
20th day 50.15 15.68 56.92 13.57 0.063
30th day 58.87 16.41 67.58 13.53 0.022
Difference between 1st day and 30th day P < 0.0002 P < 0.0001
Download Excel Table
mpr-3-1-17-g4
Figure 4: Barthel score in the two groups Both groups showed statistically significant differences in Barthel score between the 1st day and the 30th day (paired t-test). Remarkably, there was statistically significant difference in Barthel score between two groups on the 30th day (P < 0.05, t-test).
Download Original Figure
mpr-3-1-17-g5
Figure 5: Barthel rank in the two groups Two groups showed statistically significant differences in Barthel rank between the lst day and the 30th day with P < 0.000l (chi-square test). Remarkably, there was statistically significant differences in Barthel rank between two groups on the 30th day (P < 0.05, chi-square test).
Download Original Figure

Both treatments of the two groups took advantages of modified acupuncture. Modified acupuncture does not apply only traditional medicine’s theory (all acupoints selected were on the injured meridians as the acupoints on paralyzed limbs were used), but also modern medicine’s theory (all acupoints selected were on both ends of the weak or paralyzed muscles for better muscles contraction). Moreover, modified acupuncture applies electrical therapy by low-frequency electrical stimulation which can help rehabilitate the weak or paralyzed muscles. Last but not least, modified acupuncture also applies the neurobiology`s theory; as once proprioceptive sensory inputted in muscles are stimulated, it can stimulate both the sensory and the motor cortex [8, 11].

The Bobath method had two main purposes: spasticity prevention and rehabilitation of voluntary motor function in the paralyzed side. As a result, all exercises were focused on decreasing joint stiffness and enhancing muscle strength. Besides, the exercises used for each patient were similar according to patients’ stage of disease and patients’ health status (passive exercises, partly active exercises or active exercises).

The motor relearning program had two main purposes: facilitating brain reorganization and functional recovery. This method helped patients actively rehabilitate with intensive exercises. It promoted both physical and mental activities, as well as skills acquisition. The exercises used for each patient were different. This method is based on: First, there is functional plasticity after stroke associated with task-oriented exercise; second, training in real-life tasks can be a stimulus to make more functional connections within the remaining brain tissue and to form new synapses [1].

The reason why the trial group showed better results than the control group can be explained in two ways. In one way, in the control group, only one method supported brain reorganization while both methods in the trial group could facilitate brain reorganization. This opinion was also proven in many researches which stated that the combination of physical therapy and mental exercise was good for motor rehabilitation. In the other way, in the trial group, patients did specific tasks in real life with a real object. When performing a concrete task involved meaningful interactions with an object, patients demonstrated superior motor performance compared to an abstract task with no object involved [1].

4. CONCLUSION

The combination of modified acupuncture and motor relearning method is more effective than the combination of modified acupuncture and Bobath method in the rehabilitation of motor deficit after stroke.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Funding for this study was provided in part by research grants from the Department of Science and Technology, Soc Trang province.

REFERENCES

1.

Carr JH, Shepherd RB. Stroke rehabilitation. 1st ed. China: RDC Group Limited. 2003.

2.

Carr JH, Shepherd RB. A motor relearning model for rehabilitation.In: In: Carr JH, Shepherd RB, editors.editors. Movement science: Foundations for physical therapy in rehabilitation. Rockville: Aspen Publishers. 1987.

3.

Chan DYL, Chan CCH, Au DKS. Motor relearning programme for stroke patients: a randomised controlled trial. Clinical rehabilitation. 2006; 20:191-200

4.

Ha THL, Phan QCH. Rehabilitating effect on motor deficit after stroke of a revised method of acupuncture. Y Hoc TP. Ho Chi Minh. 2005; 9(2):64-72.

5.

Krutulyte G, Kimtys A, Krisciunas A. [The effectiveness of physical therapy methods (Bobath and motor relearning program) in rehabilitation of stroke patients]. Medicina (Kaunas). 2003; 39(9):889-95.

6.

Le VT, Nguyen TKL, et al. New advancements in stroke treatment and stroke unit. Y Hoc TP. Ho Chi Minh. 2011; 65:9-11.

7.

Nguyen DK, Pham TNA, et al. Effectiveness of the motor relearning programme compared with the traditional approach on the chronic stroke patients. Y Hoc TP. Ho Chi Minh. 2012; 16(4):76-82.

8.

Phan QCH. Motor rehabilitation after stroke by modified acupuncture. 2013; pp p. 24-32Located at:University of Medicine and Pharmacy. .

9.

Tran VC. Rehabilitation on motor deficit patients after stroke. Medical publishing house. 2010; pp:15-40.

10.

Trinh TDT, Phan QCH. Improving the treatment of motor deficit after stroke with a combination of new method of acupuncture and active exercise. Y Hoc TP. Ho Chi Minh. 2008; 12(4):18-27.

11.

Trinh TDT, Phan QCH. Improving the treatment of motor deficit after supratentorial ischemic stroke with a combination of new method of acupuncture and active exercise. Y Hoc TP. Ho Chi Minh. 2013; 17(1):25-33.

12.

Rodgers A, Vaughan P. The world health report 2002: Reducing risks, promoting healthy life [Internet]. France: World Health Organization. 2002[cited 2015]Available from: http://www.who.int/whr/2002/en/whr02_en.pdf?ua=1.